jump to navigation

What’s the good sport ? May 29, 2006

Posted by Abhishek in Abhishek, Motorsport.
trackback

As the dust settles on yet another Monaco Grand Prix, pundits will, not unexpectedly, have much to talk about. Most notably, Michael Schumacher's 'stall' at La Rascasse – in the final minute of qualifying. After 8 hours of deliberations, talks and runs and re-runs of tapes and telemetry it was decided to relegate Schumacher to the back of the grid. But, yet, despite all odds, the man finished a spectacular 5th, registering en route, yet another fastest lap at Monaco.

But this is not about how well Schumacher drove around the back-file, how he made his strategy work for him, or even how he did not give up till the last corner of the last lap. That after all comes in-built with a Schumacher. A driver starting from last finishing 5th would have made the centre-point of any evening news show, but the fact remains, that all Schumacher takes away from Monaco apart from the 3 points, is yet another small stain, in what many believe to be a not-so-spotless shirt.

Schumacher has always bent the rules. When the $50,000 worth diamonds on a steering wheel are probably the cheapest parts of a car, not surprisingly, the stakes are high. So high in fact, that the lines between what is fair and what is not are often made murky ; smudged out by playing with them too often. Like a game of poker, you play your bluff calculating if the consequences are going to be worth the risk. In simple terms, Michael Schumacher is 7 times World Champion because in his book, winning is everything, worth any risk, any gamble.

We had a saying in school – "you are allowed to copy as long as you don't get caught". Schumacher tried to copy, but unfortunately for him, he got caught. But only this time. He knew what could happen, but if had got off lightly (which is not uncommon in F1), it meant a sure race win – and another joyous leap on the podium, surely something not to be spoilt by a Spanish kid in blue and yellow. He failed this time, but knowing from past experience he will do it again and again and again, so long as the balance is tipped in his favour. Consider, the ’94 championship fight between him and Damon Hill –when he slammed into his championship rival to pocket his 1st title with Benetton. Consider his jab at David Coulthard in the ’98 Argentine GP. Again unpunished.

Here readers will point me out to the stripped 2nd spot in the ’97 season to Villeneuve and the heavy fine for the incident at the Austrian GP with Rubens Barichello in ’04. Here too, Schumacher was totally aware of the risks, and was willing to take the chance. And here is where he is a cut above the rest.

Damon Hill once famously said:

"There are two things that set Michael apart from the rest of the drivers in Formula One – his sheer talent and his attitude. I am full of admiration for the former, but the latter leaves me cold."

And it is the latter that makes him a world beater. Talent – a lot of people have, but how many people are ready to put their brother’s life in danger to gain a single position?

Here I am reminded of ridiculous attempts at ‘diving’ in football, attempts at ball-tampering in cricket and doping in athletics. One man’s cheating is another’s ‘gamesmanship’ – and it is such questions that sport will have to answer in future times. These are not easy questions to resolve, and indeed with the increase in money and fame that sport commands, the law-makers have to be on their toes to ensure their idea of ‘fair-play’ is preserved. However he who knows where to cut corners, and bend the rules will always, always have his nose ahead. Only with a little black dot clinging to it.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Kedar Deokule - May 29, 2006

Hi Abhishek,

I’m a big fan of Schumacher and his ability…but your line of thinking seems very close to a cognitive bias below:

The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come true.

2. Abhishek - May 30, 2006

OK, firstly – i am thinking what exactly are you claiming to be a SFP ?
as my friend and ‘logic professor’ Kunal puts it ;

“see if schumacher read your blog, and you complained that he was a cheater, and…he said, they call me a cheater when i don’t cheat, and so cheated in the next GP…THAT would be a SFP”

secondly, to clarify the post ‘my line of thinking’ as you put it,is that
Schumacher cheats because the pay-off is worth more than the risk involved. This is true not for all drivers (or sportspersons) because the value they put on things like clean-record, good-name, sportsmanship etc is much higher that what he does. However, as the stakes get higher – many more people will have a sitution in which the cost they attach to the above things cannot match up to the risks involved.

Thirdly, i propose the solution that if people want to see their views on ‘sportsmanship’ to be preserved, then law-makers have to enact laws, which prevents the other supposedly ‘cheating’ sportspersons from making the supposedly ‘wrong’ decision.

There.

3. Dushyant Wadivkar - May 30, 2006

I could not see how one can argue from either sides. He could have really stalled but his reputation precedes him, making all of us think twice. In any case, what is done is done and I expect him to come back steaming.

By the way, He made four points at Monaco.

4. Abhishek - May 31, 2006

Hey, thanks Dushyant for pointing that error put.
“I expect him to come back steaming.”

I think it’s unfait to say he was not steaming at Monaco. 😉

5. Amit Goyal - June 5, 2006
6. Sinfully Pinstripe - June 5, 2006

Hehehe.

I sometimes wonder how people contrive of ways to praise their superstar. A Maradona is a cheat but a Schumacher is a champion, or vice versa. A Steve Waugh catch taken after two drops easily becoming ‘a player is always within his rights to appeal’, and a Ganguly making the same Steve wait before the toss becoming just an attitude problem. Or vice versa. A Flo-Jo dying of a heart attack at 39 being ‘but she never failed a dope test, did she?’, and a Jarmila Kratochvilova (who never failed a dope test either) being a man. Or vice versa.

No offence meant, Abhishek. In my book, there will always be one God in football, and Schumacher will be a cheat, a repeat offender, and a sorry example at sportsmanship. But we live with our prejudices, don’t we.

7. Black hottie in fishnet stockings seduces her man and gets licked on the - June 5, 2012

Big Tits Babe Masturbating HD


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: